Recycling and separating waste at home is an important step in reducing the amount of trash that goes to landfill

Global warming is a reality and is one of the biggest environmental challenges facing the planet today. According to the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), the global average temperature has risen by approximately 1.1°C since pre-industrial times (2021) and is expected to rise further in the future.

This rise in temperature is having negative effects that are already being felt, especially in altering weather patterns in different regions, including the increase and intensification of natural disasters; as well as sea level rise, ocean acidification, and shrinking glaciers.

As we know, human activity is the main cause of global warming, especially deforestation and the release of greenhouse gases, which is an effect of burning fossil fuels. Although more structural change is needed (at the level of large industries and countries), daily actions can also have a significant impact.



Reduce the use of plastics and disposable products

As we have seen, the environment is essential for our survival and for that of all the species that inhabit the planet. Despite the fact that we have this essential knowledge, we often forget that many of the resources we use every day (such as water) are not renewable, and therefore tukif, we can reach the point of exhausting them.

Although it seems that we are approaching a point of no return as far as global warming is concerned, we still have time to take action. While governments meet each year at the Conference of the Parties (COP) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) to define what actions to take at a macro level, each of us has an individual responsibility. These are simple actions we can take to help the planet:

  • Recycling and separating waste at home is an important step in reducing the amount of trash that goes to landfill. Likewise, reusing materials and giving them a new life can be a great idea.
  • Save energy and use renewable sources: Turning off lights and other electronic devices when they are not being used is a simple and effective way to save energy and take care of the environment.
  • Planting trees and caring for plants help increase biodiversity and reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
  • Using sustainable transport, such as bicycles or public transport, helps to reduce the carbon footprint.
  • Buy local and seasonal products to reduce your carbon footprint.
  • Saving water, when brushing your teeth, washing your hands and bathing, is a way of being aware of and caring for this valuable resource.
  • Reduce the use of plastics and disposable products. Especially single-use plastic bottles, buying aluminum bottles for example.
  • Support environmental policies and laws. Educate yourself on issues and share useful information that helps the community. Likewise, buy sustainable products.
  • Participating in cleanup and conservation activities in your community is one way to contribute to a cleaner and more sustainable place.



Related Posts




It’s not a joke. It is not an exaggeration. Our planet is long overdue for the consequences of our irresponsible behavior towards nature. And while he’s been generous all these years, he’s starting to make his boundaries clear.

According to IPCC research, the current state of our ecosystem puts us on high alert. In just under 10 years, humanity will face an unprecedented global climate catastrophe. An irreversible catastrophe, which will test our survival as a species xnxx.

To fight against this, currently various national and international organizations have sought to do their bit, undertaking conservation and environmental protection initiatives. Do you want to meet them? Today we bring you a list of the most outstanding.




Its almost 50 years of foundation do justice to its recognition. After all, when thinking of organizations dedicated to the defense of the environment, we cannot help but think of them.

For years, Greenpeace has fought against climate change, has worked to defend biodiversity and, above all, has waged war against those who hunt whales indiscriminately. It is currently present in 55 countries and has approximately 3 million members worldwide.


2.The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)

It may not be as well known by name as Greenpeace, but its power and influence is undeniable. The NRDC currently has just under 3 million active members, in addition to an expert panel of more than 700 scientists, legal scholars, and environmental policy specialists.

Its focus is to safeguard the right of people to breathe clean air and consume clean water, in addition to protecting the most fragile and vulnerable ecosystems on the planet. To achieve this, they work together in environmental lobbying with companies, government groups and even self-managed communities. The idea is to convince these groups to adopt certain measures to take care of the environment.


This organization is much younger than the others (it was founded in 1992, within the framework of the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro), it has also made significant contributions, in addition to its large number of members.
Their way of working consists of operating by exerting social pressure on governments and large companies so that they take measures to reduce the environmental footprint of their actions.


4.International Pollutant Elimination Network (IPEN)

This global network is currently part of 600 NGOs, with a presence in 124 countries today. Your mission? A planet earth without chemical emissions of polluting agents for the environment.
They intervene in international and national policies in the regulation of industrial activities to make it possible.


It may not be as well known as Greenpeace or others mentioned below, but its strength in Europe is undeniable. Its main focus is social, supporting less favored groups.
However, the organization is also present and operates on environmental issues, working on projects to fight climate change and guarantee food security.

6.Global Green Growth Institute (GGGI)

Young, yes. Unstoppable in its few years of operation, too. Founded just 10 years ago, the GGGI has worked for years towards an ambitious goal: to lead our planet to absolute decarbonization through inclusive, resilient projects that also guarantee its sustainable growth over time.
Its main activities consist of the movement of private investment capital to lead the states to apply environmental measures.

7.Ecologists in Action

Together we can create a greater impact than apart. For this reason, we close this list not with an NGO, but with a conglomerate of them. More than 300 local and regional organizations in Spain join forces to promote social ecology movements.

To do this, they address the problem from its roots: the consumerist society and the excessive production models of the modern world.

What other environmental organizations that fight to protect our planet do you know? Share them with us and our readers in the comments.


Related Posts




We all know: we live in a world of men. A world where, at least until a few years ago, men were the only ones capable of making a striking change with their voice and actions. However, in this world of men, for many years, there have been incredible women who have dedicated their lives to environmentalism.

The contribution of these women has been significant throughout history with indispensable actions or speeches in the fight to improve and make people aware of natural conservation and the dangers and effects of the climate crisis.




We start the list with one of the most famous names in the environmental world today: Greta Thunberg. Born in 2003, this 16-year-old girl has managed to make a significant impact thanks to her speech at the 2019 UNICEF Climate Summit.

She started a school strike of her own in 2018, openly expressing her discontent with the current policies in the face of climate change and the impact on her.

Her initiative ‘Fridays for Future’ has inspired millions of children around the world to take a space to debate and propose ideas to face the current environmental crisis of our planet.



Although not as mediatic as Greta, Wangari has had a strong impact on the world with the renowned ‘Green Belt Movement’. This project aimed, among other things, to plant thousands of trees throughout Kenya, her native country. Thanks to this she got the nickname “The Tree Woman”.

In 2004 she received the Nobel Peace Prize for her actions in defense of the environment and the search for sustainable development of human activities porno français.




We take a brief trip back in time to 1978 to talk about Lois Gibbs, who not only saved the lives of her children, but hundreds of children in her town. After noticing that her children suffered from numerous illnesses, she set out to investigate the cause. That’s how she discovered that the local school was built on a toxic waste dump.

Her discovery led her to organize strong protests and neighborhood mobilizations, with which she managed to relocate 800 families in danger in the area. In addition, she founded the “Center for Health, Environment and Justice”, an organization dedicated to environmental study. Her actions earned her a Godman Environmental Award.


4. Rachel Carson

Rachel Carson

We go even further back, to the beginning of the 20th century, to discover the history of this passionate about marine biology. Academic and environmentalist, she published the best seller known worldwide as ‘Silent Spring’. Her work was a direct call for attention to the indiscriminate use of insecticide, a product that is harmful to the environment and the ozone layer.

Her work gave rise to the creation of the ‘United States Environmental Protection Agency’, an organization that prohibited the use of DDT. Likewise, she was an active environmentalist dedicated to raising awareness of the damage that certain chemicals do to the environment.


Related Posts



Cary academy and its values

Cary Academy, the host organization for this journal, is an independent coeducational, college-preparatory day school for students in grades 6-12. Cary Academy’s mission commits the school to creating and maintaining an environment in which discovery, innovation, collaboration, and excellence are fostered. Founded in 1996 and opened in 1997, the school is on the forefront of technology-enhanced education. When fully enrolled, Cary Academy will have a student body of 672. Each student, faculty and staff member has access to the school’s internal Intranet and the external Internet. Students use the school’s technological resources to gather data, analyze porno mexicano information, develop research skills and reinforce classroom lessons. Each Cary Academy family, student, faculty and staff member has his own e-mail account providing an additional means of communication.

Cary Academy is fortunate in that it has a corporate partner and neighbor, SAS Institute, a software development company. The founders/owners of SAS Institute, Dr. and Mrs. James H. Goodnight and Mr. and Mrs. John P. Sall, also founded Cary Academy. Cary Academy has benefited greatly from the expertise of SAS Institute’s SAS In School division and having such a close corporate partner.

Our values

SPIRITUALITY is the recognition that there is a “mysterious other” that exists in the universe that is sacred and at the core of all being. Spirituality honors, embraces and acknowledges the mystery with the understanding that we can never fully comprehend or explain its existence. By its very nature, spirituality promotes a sense of wonder, awe, and celebration of life. A belief in the ultimate goodness of the mystery causes us to reach out to others (human and non-human) through love, compassion and forgiveness.

COMMUNITY is the local ecological context in which spirituality becomes manifest. Community consists of an infinite number of interconnected components, all of which function to support the health and well-being of the entire system as well as the individuals therein. Community is also the recognition that people are one unique element within this system; that our survival depends on maintaining the health of the entire community of life.

SUSTAINABILITY is the process of nurturing, upholding and preserving balance among all members of an ecological community. To sustain is to nourish, support and prolong. Sustainability, therefore, is the ability to nurture, uphold and preserve the integrity of individuals and communities of life indefinitely; recognizing that change is inevitable. Furthermore, sustainability embraces the need for compassionate confrontation and healing of those individuals and components of a community that are diseased or in need of sustenance and encouragement. The entire life system is only as strong and durable as are its component members.


How to Restore the Conscience of America’s Communities: a Grass Roots Approach

The Spiritual Connection
Society has undergone a spiritual revival in recent years. The notion of spirituality is cropping up in all sorts of contexts. It seems that we’ve caught on that there’s something important about it. But if you ask ten people to explain the word “spiritual”, you’re likely to get ten different answers. Whether it’s a theologian or a talk show host, an anthropologist or your average man on the street, pretty much everyone drifts into abstract vagueness when they speak of porno gratis matters spiritual. On the other hand, there are folks out there who never even mention spirituality; who would shrug and scratch their heads if you brought it up. Yet these same people could be deeply infused with spirit. Truthfully, we are all infused with spirit, every human being, but it seems that certain people are more developed in this regard.

It is quite correct to have discovered that spirituality is important. It’s a good sign. However, not everyone realizes just how important spirituality actually is. Important to the mental and physical health of every person, and important to the health of the world. Indeed, now more than ever a there is a critical need for the world to rediscover true spirituality. Vague hints are not good enough. Spirituality is not merely an abstraction, but an experience; not just a fuzzy notion, but a concrete and specific thing. And until you experience it yourself, there isn’t much use in hearing someone else describe it. Nevertheless, let me offer a few sentences by way of introduction, and then refer you to some of the more authoritative sources on the resource pages. (see Transcendental Meditation, other practices).

The Knower, The Knowing and The Known

From an intellectual standpoint, the key aspect of spirituality, the main point to grasp, is that reality consists of three parts: the knower, the process of knowing, and the known. These are the three primitives; the three irreducible elements from which all further discussion must derive. It’s should be intuitively clear that the entity which knows, the observer, is you. It’s also pretty clear that the process of knowing, or observing, has something to do with your five senses, and perhaps with other faculties as well. The known, of course, is all that is “out there”, in the environment.

An On-going Process of Internal Growth

But the known is actually more than what’s out there. For example, you can look at yourself, in which case the known becomes you. You would then be both the observer and the observed. This is actually a key concept: To know thyself … to know the knower. But here’s the trick. This is not just a concept, it’s a practice. It’s something that one does. Moreover, it’s possible to work at this, to improve one’s technique, and progress through stages of spiritual development as you progress through life. This is another important point: that spirituality is an on-going process of internal growth.
Internal means inside of you. Not inside your body, or inside your brain, but in the non-material region of the mind/body continuum. People who are further along the spiritual path are able to recognize this internal, mental aspect of life. The reason this is important is because being in touch with your inner side is the more natural way to live. They call this “enlightenment”. There are great benefits that come out of it, both physiological and psychological.

When you’re in touch with your inner self, your character begins to form. Your best qualities start to come out, including the quality of compassion. This is how the quality of life is affected. When a community contains greater numbers of enlightened, compassionate people, things get better. It has to do with the interaction among community members. The enlightened people affect the thinking and the behavior of the unenlightened simply by moving among them: working, talking, socializing, carrying on the routines of life. There are of course degrees of this – partial enlightenment – but any amount of enlightenment at all in the community is better than complete darkness. Taking it a step further, the more enlightened communities we have, the better the whole of society becomes. Unfortunately, for quite a while now most of the world has been carrying on in state that is closer to darkness than to enlightenment. There are signs that things are changing, but we still have a long road ahead of us.

All Religions are Included

Notice that we have not mentioned God or religion. When it comes to matters of civic responsibility, you need to be as inclusive as possible. If you talked about spirituality in terms of a particular religious tradition – Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, etc. – there would certainly be folks from other backgrounds who will take exception to your arguments. Moreover, religion itself is just the envelope, the outer trappings, of a deeper personal experience – a divine experience – that transcends all religions. Whatever route you take to this experience is a good one. Whatever spiritual tradition you have is valuable when you pursue it to its ultimate source in the divine. Garden Zone Community Management calls for a renewal of interest in spirituality, and in fact depends on this renewal in order for it to succeed, but it also requires that a manager remain neutral from a religious standpoint in order to attract the widest ecumenical support.

Organizational Responsibilities

In a company developing and manufacturing electronics, the typical product-related environmental issues could be the following:

  • Energy use during product life-time
  • Banned and restricted substances in the production and in the products
  • Materials use in products (including packaging material)
  • Securing optimal treatment of the products in the end-of-life situation
  • Using these issues as an example, this section looks into the implementation of Eco-Design in the organisation as an ongoing activity.

Considering these points, here a brief description of the responsibilities of each of these parts of the organisation:

Should set up the company’s general product related environmental policy, and in cooperation with Marketing and Development set targets for improvement in environmental performance of products (see ‘Environmental Metrics).
For every new product development or major revision of an existing product, environmental goals should be set up in the requirements specification, on line with other product attributes and performance requirements.

Should investigate customer requirements and market trends concerning environmental issues.
Should include environmental issues in the communication strategy, e.g. communicate to the customers about the products environmental performance, and what the customer can do to minimise the environmental impact of the products.

Should be trained in understanding environmental aspects of electronics, and applying Eco-Design guidelines.
Responsible for achieving the product related environmental goals set up by management (see ‘Development of Environmental Metrics’ and ‘Environmental Calculator’)
Should ensure, that raw materials, components and sub-assemblies fulfil requirements concerning official and company-specific lists of banned and restricted substances.
Before accepting new suppliers, the suppliers should either give a full material declaration on their product, or declare the specific content of substances mentioned in the lists of banned and restricted substances in their products.
Should set up environmental requirements for suppliers, e.g. about their environmental management systems and their preparedness to deliver environmental data on their products (see Customer Requirements / Market Demands).
Should secure that no substances on the official and company-specific lists of banned and restricted substances are used in the production.
Should provide feedback to the development team, e.g. concerning ways to minimise waste in the production by altering the design, or ways to make disassembly easier etc.
Should inform the customer about the environmental aspects of the products (e.g. energy use during life-time, energy savings features, upgradability, take-back possibilities etc.), and about the measures that the customer can take to minimise the environmental impacts (see Communication).
Should provide feedback to the marketing and development team on customer experience and requirements.
Should, if possible, specify shipment with transportation means having the least environmental impact.
Should advise the customer of upgrade possibilities and other ways to prolong useful lifetime of the product.
Should guide the customer as to when it, from an environmental point of view, would be optimal to exchange the old product with a new one, e.g. when an old product can be substituted with a new using considerably less energy.
Should ensure, that scrapped products are taken back or that the customer is informed about the optimal treatment possibilities.
Should provide feedback to the marketing and development team on customer experience and requirements.
Should ensure, that all relevant personnel are properly informed and trained, so they can fulfil their role
Should gather information about existing and upcoming legislation.
Should keep track of environmental performance of both own products and the competitors, and of state-of-the-art in Eco-Design.

ERG model development

The ERG has developed a unique modelling/emissions capability; the ‘London Air Pollution Toolkit’. This has been the model of choice for a number of important developments for London, including detailed modelling for the review and assessment process, to estimate the impacts associated with the London Low Emission Zone (LEZ) and for the impacts associated with Congestion Charging. Additionally the ‘Toolkit’ has provided the basis for environmental impacts for a wide variety of schemes, including the Thames Gateway, container terminal development, the Greenwich Peninsula development, the new Thames river crossing and in support in the Mayor of London’s air quality strategy.


The toolkit uses unique methods to provide highly detailed spatial maps. Predictions can be made at 5m intervals. Use of accurate road networks also allow detailed air pollution exposure assessments.
Outputs are compatible with GIS tools.
Unique treatment of NOX/NO2 chemistry and new PM10 model, incorporating PM2.5 results.
Extensive validation undertaken using London Air Quality Network (LAQN) dataset and statistical treatment of sources emitting pollutants at different heights.
Utilises most recent street canyon model (OSPM v5.0.64).
Capable of modelling > 1 million individual sources each with different source characteristics.
Other modelling capabilities

In addition to the ‘Toolkit’, the ERG has use of individual models, such as OSPM, ADMS and AERMOD, for specific modelling  requirements, for example, the effects of shipping, large industrial processes, detailed street canyon studies and in support of large infrastructure developments.

Environment Agency Modelling Software

The ERG provides innovative solutions to modelling problems, an example of which is the software developed for the Environment Agency study of large industrial plant in the East Thames corridor. The software allowed the analysis of scenarios to be made without lengthy model runs being undertaken.

Fact Sheet on Air Toxics

Toxic comes from the Greek word toxikon which referred to the poison smeared on an arrow. The meaning has changed but not the intent. Air toxics are poisonous airborne pollutants which exist in the atmosphere either as gases or attached to fine particles.

Some air toxics come from natural sources such as dust, forest fires, volcanic gases and soil erosion. But most are created by human activities including industrial processes, the manufacture and use of pesticides, and the burning of fossil fuels such as gas, oil or coal.

Air toxics find their way into the atmosphere in two ways. Some are emitted directly from cars, trucks and train engines or from factories which burn fossil fuels. Others are discharged into water or onto the land, and because they possess the characteristic known as volatility, they escape into the air as gases or attached to fine particles.

The atmosphere plays an important role in the environmental cycle of air toxics. Sometimes it can carry them thousands of kilometres from their source and wash them to earth as rain, snow, fog or mist. The atmosphere may also transform air toxics into even more dangerous porno xxx.

Air toxics pose a serious threat to human health and to wildlife for three reasons.

First, they are poisonous, or may become poisonous after combining with other substances or bioaccumulating in the food chain. The toxics may cause death, disease, birth defects, genetic mutations and behavioural abnormalities as well as physiological or reproductive harm in organisms or their offspring.

Second, the toxics bioaccumulate in the fatty tissue of animals, and are difficult or impossible to metabolize or excrete. Even minute amounts may have a major effect on wildlife as the toxics build up to a dangerous level over the lifetime of the animal. Bioaccumulating in the food chain occurs when, for example, plankton which has absorbed toxic chemicals from the water is eaten by fish, which, after storing the toxics in fatty tissues, are then eaten by birds. Because the birds are at the top of this food chain, they may over time accumulate levels of toxics which are thousands of times higher than those in their prey, which themselves were thousands of times higher than those in the plankton.
Third, these toxics are persistent, meaning that they do not break down easily in the environment and may remain intact for decades or even centuries.

Environment Canada is involved in a range of research projects aimed at understanding how air toxics are emitted, transported, transformed and deposited by the atmosphere. Further, the department is heavily involved in the development and enforcement of regulations to prevent the emission of air toxics into the atmosphere.

The most common culprits:

The industrial world uses more than 65,000 commercial chemicals. In 1985, the International Joint Commission identified 11 pollutants which the Canadian-U.S. body considered critical:

1. Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)
2. Mirex
3. Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
4. Dieldrin
5. DDT
6. 2,3,7,8-TCDD
7. 2,3,7,8-TCDF
8. Benzo[a]pyrene
9. Toxaphene
10. Mercury
11. Alkylated lead

Environmental Protection Act (EPA) & Pollution Prevention and Control (PPC)

Polluting activities and Industrial emissions in the UK have been controlled, to some extent, for over 150 years and are currently regulated under both the Environmental Protection Act 1990 (EPA) and the Pollution Prevention and Control Act 1999 (PPC).

There are also a number of other directives that contribute towards the regulation of porno italiani environmental emissions such as the Solvent Emissions Directive (SED) and the Waste Incineration Directive (WID). There are a number of guidance documents available to provide information about the structure and requirements of these regulations.

  • GG Notes (General Guidance)
  • AQ Notes (additional guidance notes on local authority industrial pollution control issues)
  • PG Notes (Process Guidance) The Process Guidance (PG) notes are issued under the EPA and PPC Regulations. They form statutory guidance on what constitute the Best Available Techniques (BAT) for the installations regulated.

In 2000, the PPC regulations came into effect throughout UK industry as required by the EC Directive (96/61). This resulted in the need for significant changes to the regulatory requirements. Since then, old EPA regimes of Integrated Pollution Control (IPC) and Local Air Pollution Control (LAPC) have begun the process of being progressively replaced by the new regimes of PPC. The PPC regulations introduced 3 new systems of pollution control:

  1. Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC), which covers installations known as A(1) installations, which are regulated by the Environment Agency;
  2. Local Authority Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (LA-IPPC) which covers installations known as A(2) installations, which are regulated by local authorities;
  3. Local Authority Pollution Prevention and Control (LAPPC), which covers installations known as Part B installations, also regulated by local authorities.

A(1) installations generally have a greater potential to pollute the environment than A(2) installations and Part B installations would have the least potential to pollute. Similar to the EPA system which required all industrial activities to have an authorisation to operate; all polluting activities which fall under the remit of the PPC regulations are required to be ‘permited’. These ‘permits’ contain conditions of operations which act to reduce or prevent the emissions of pollutants and reduce or prevent the usage of polluting substances.

Best Available Technique (BAT)

The aim of the PPC regime is achieving a high level of protection of the environment. This is achieved by, among other things, requiring operators to use the best available techniques (BAT).

Regulations define BAT as “the most effective and advanced stage in the development of activities and their methods of operation which indicates the practical suitability of particular techniques for providing in principle the basis for emission limit values designed to prevent and, where that is not practicable, generally to reduce emissions and the impact on the environment as a whole”.

Solvent Emissions Directive (SED)

The Solvent Emissions (England and Wales) Regulations 2004, SI 107, which came into force on 20 January 2004.

The aim of this Directive is to prevent or reduce the direct and indirect effects of emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) into the environment (mainly into air), and to minimise the potential risks to human health.

There are strict requirements for those activities using potentially more harmful substances such as halogenated VOCs which are assigned the risk phrase R40 or VOCs that are classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to reproduction and which carry the risk phrase R45, R46, R49, R60 or R61.

The Directive also requires Regulators to request ‘Solvent Management Plans’ (SMP) from the permitted installations. The SMP is effectively a tool for determining the VOC or Solvent Usage and emissions.

Waste Incineration Directive (WID)

The Waste Incineration Directive (WID) is a single piece of European legislations which introduces operating conditions and sets minimum technical requirements for waste incineration and co-incineration. It covers virtually all waste incineration, and co-incineration plants.

Success in the US Emissions Trading

The emissions trading system introduced under the US Acid Rain Program has been a triumph of the past five years. The concept has since been adopted in a federal nitrogen oxide programme and numerous local initiatives. David Biello looks back

By October 1999, when Environmental Finance was launched, the US Environmental Protection Agency’s sulphur dioxide (SO2) market – the Acid Rain Program – had already held six auctions and weathered numerous storms, such as a doubling in price from less than $100/ton at the start of 1998 to more than $200 by July of that year. Approaching the end of the first compliance period, in December 1999, when emissions were capped at only 110 electric utility power plants, the market looked forward to the inclusion of most videos xxx in Phase II.
Prices remained around $200/ton in anticipation of this expansion of the market, but didn’t stay there for long. In November 1999, after several years of investigation, the Clinton administration announced lawsuits against 51 power plants in 10 states. They alleged that these plants had expanded their operations without installing state-of-the-art pollution controls, as required by the New Source Review (NSR) provision of the Clean Air Act.

Potentially, the NSR lawsuits could have removed significant demand from the market as they would have obliged the affected plants to fit costly technology to curb their emissions – and would not have allowed them to sell the excess allowances. On 3 November 1999, when the lawsuits were announced, an SO2 allowance traded for $180/ton. By the end of the year, the price had dropped to roughly $120.

By spring 2000, the first year of the expanded programme, prices had recovered somewhat. Utilities filed counter-suits charging the Clinton administration with arbitrarily changing the definitions of the NSR, the industry lobbied Congress for relief, and a presidential election promised at least the potential for change. In short, participants in the SO2 market realised that the NSR arguments would take time to be resolved. As a result, prices recovered to $150/ton and hovered around that level until the fall.

But such prices could not withstand the slew of settlement announcements in the fall of that year. First, the EPA announced a settlement with Virginia Electric Power Company (VEPCO) that required it to cut SO2 and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from eight coal-burning plants by roughly 70% by 2008. Most significantly for the market, VEPCO agreed not to trade any allowances resulting from the settlement.

Other settlements followed, including a tentative deal with Ohio-based power giant Cinergy that would have affected emissions at 10 coal-fired power plants throughout the Midwest and reduced SO2 and NOx emissions by hundreds of thousands of tons. SO2 allowance prices, predictably, began to fall back towards $100/ton, bottoming out at $115.

Soon, however, the significance of these settlements was called into question. After all, companies were given until 2008 to install the pollution control technology. And so, the market began to trade up again, if slowly. Then Enron gave the market a real boost. In the 2001 SO2 allowance auction, Enron swept the field ahead of American Electric Power (AEP), a natural buyer that historically had purchased most of the available allowances. Prices began a long climb through the summer of 2001, reaching a then record high of $225 shortly before 11 September.

The tragedy of that day inflicted losses of key personnel and infrastructure on the SO2 market and, in the weeks that followed, prices dipped below $200 once more. In November, a surprise move by Enron to sell 900,000 tons – a very large chunk by market standards – was followed by a brief spike that collapsed upon subsequent news of Enron’s demise.

In fact, Enron’s collapse – coupled with the emotional and financial aftershocks of 11 September – sent the SO2 market into a tailspin. Through the winter, spring and summer of 2002, the market remained moribund, with low prices and little trading, despite the Bush administration’s announcement of its Clear Skies initiative, which would continue the work of the Acid Rain Program beyond 2010. Steadily dropping from $170/ton in the spring to $127 by November 2002, allowance prices suffered from the sell-off of Enron’s assets. The price collapse was compounded by the sale of excess allowances – and perhaps more – by other energy companies trying to generate cash quickly to offset other financial problems in the chaotic energy markets, triggered by the Houston giant’s collapse.

By the end of 2002, although few recognised it at the time, the SO2 market was poised for a long and sustained recovery. The Bush administration had released a proposal to reform the NSR provision radically and effectively allow power companies to undertake repairs without fear of lawsuits; the industry as a whole recognised that some form of multi-pollutant legislation – whether Bush’s Clear Skies or not – would ensure trading continued through the coming decades; and the economic position of the power companies began to improve, if only slightly.

Slowly but surely, the market began a steady climb from $135 at the beginning of 2003 to highs above $220 by the year end. The government’s NSR proposals became fact – subject to lawsuits as usual – allowing power plants to perform equipment replacements if the new parts were functionally the same as the old or did not cost more than 20% of the value of the entire unit. New market participants, like financial giant Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, helped facilitate trading in the absence of Enron.
Significantly, however, these price gains were made on seriously reduced volume. Prices gapped up on trades of as little as 500 tons – well below market norms – and that trend continued into 2004. The price of 2004 allowances rose from $230 to $280 by the end of March on little volume, then from $280/ton to $450 by the beginning of July. By 15 July, the price stood at $630, a near five-fold rise in just a year and a half.

Of course, such highs could not be sustained and by September of this year prices had fallen back to around $480/ton, still on low volumes. But the concept of emissions trading continued to gather strength from the performance of this flagship programme. After all, by 2002, SO2 emissions from power plants were 41% less than the baseline 1980 levels of roughly 17.9 million tons.

NOx markets mature

The success of the Acid Rain Program inspired imitators. In May 1999, 11 northeastern states and the District of Columbia saw fit to create a cap-and-trade programme to address a regional smog problem, under the auspices of their Ozone Transport Commission (OTC).The states created a seasonal NOx cap for their power generators, starting at 219,000 tons in 1999, for the period 1 May–30 September, when emissions of NOx contribute most to smog formation. As with the start of many programmes, panic prices ensued, reaching highs of $7,600/ton before plummeting to just $2,000.

Going into that first compliance season, it soon became clear that the sources in the affected states had more than enough supply to meet their targets. Prices sank further, amid growing enthusiasm for a market to address NOx emissions throughout the country. In 1999, the EPA unveiled a proposal to create a 37-state NOx trading programme. Utilities and industry groups filed lawsuits to fight what they viewed as overly stringent regulations. The battle was on over what was then called the NOx State Implementation Plan (SIP) Call programme.

Meanwhile, trading in the OTC NOx market remained slow and a very cool summer in 2000 – depressing power demand and thus emissions – did little to help matters. Prices fell to historical lows of $325/ton as sources in the affected states simply had too many allowances built up to create a need for much trading. The potential for a wider market created some spark, but it took a massive price rise in natural gas in 2001 to drive a rally in the NOx price.

This spike in natural gas prices and the aftermath of the energy crisis that convulsed California in 2000 and 2001 saw allowance prices rise sharply from around $400/ton in early 2001 to $1,900 at their peak that summer. Speculators such as Enron helped fuel the rise but as soon as natural gas prices eased later that year, so did NOx prices.

Anyway, there was bigger news afoot. By 2001, the birth of a larger NOx market was relatively assured, with most lawsuits put aside and a total of 21 states set to participate. In fact, the first trade of NOx SIP Call allowances took place that summer on 6 June – a stream of allowances from fading industrial giant Bethlehem Steel covering the years 2003–07. By November, trades were occurring on a fairly regular basis, even before all the details of the enlarged market had been worked out and before the allowances had been allocated. This new, expanded market helped NOx trading stay afloat even through the tragedy of 11 September, the collapse of Enron, and the financial woes of the energy sector that followed.

By 2002, the rules of the new market were clearer. The plan called for a cap on total emissions of 3.3 million tons/year, down from a 1995 baseline of 4.4 million tons/year in the region. Several states allocated allowances in 2002 and the rules of so-called compliance supplement pools, a way for companies that had been affected by the OTC programme to keep some of their allowances, were available – if not entirely clear.

The OTC programme went through the last season of its short-lived existence and prices began to fade, dropping as low as $600/ton by the end of the year. Thanks to a large bank of excess allowances, few companies needed to buy for compliance purposes. However, the savvy trader was able to buy cheap tons which could then be converted, under the arcane rules of the compliance supplement pool, into NOx SIP Call allowances. And, while the majority of states would not join that market until the end of May 2004, nine Northeastern states at least would begin the compliance season on 1 May 2003.

The new federal NOx Budget Trading Program, created by the SIP Call, had more than 500,000 allowances ready to trade and would affect more than 1,500 utility and industrial sources by May 2004. But this dramatic expansion of the NOx market did nothing to stabilise prices. By the end of April 2003, prices for that year’s NOx reached $8,000/ton, amply rewarding those who had better mastered their compliance supplement pool rules. It did not help matters that high natural gas prices encouraged utilities to burn coal and therefore produce more NOx.

A cool summer came to the rescue, along with the other states in the programme beginning to allocate allowances to affected companies. This allowed cash-strapped industrials, like Bethlehem Steel before them, to begin to sell allowances. Prices cooled off and traded in a range around $2,500/ton until the end of the year.

Despite the addition of many more states and sources this year, NOx prices have remained subdued, though trading has picked up to the point where volumes now easily surpass those of its ancestor, the SO2 market. Helped by a short 2004 season – most sources only have to comply from 31 May instead of counting that full month – and average summer weather, current year vintages have traded as low as $1,800/ton, but remain largely in a range around $2,500.

Future year vintages, such as for 2005 and 2006, have traded actively and command a premium of more than $1,000/ton over current year prices. With the NOx market included in all proposed multi-pollutant legislation, its future seems assured.

The future

A pall, however, hangs over both the NOx and SO2 markets. The looming darkness is a pending decision by the federal government on how to deal with mercury pollution. The Bush administration would like to see the roughly 48 tons of mercury released each year by US power plants traded in an emissions market not unlike the SO2 and NOx programmes. Environmentalists and some senators, however, have called for absolute cuts in mercury pollution from each installation, citing its neurotoxicity and prevalence in US waters.

The decision on how to deal with this issue will have a significant impact on the SO2 and NOx markets. If mercury must be removed on an absolute basis at each plant, utilities will be forced to install controls in the near future that will also filter out much of the SO2 and NOx emissions. If mercury is traded, then perhaps those controls will be put on over a more extended timeframe. Either way, the decision on mercury will likely have a profound impact on both these existing emission markets. EF

BOX – Trading from the regions

The EPA’s sulphur dioxide (SO2) market is not the oldest cap-and-trade market in the US. While it was the first set out, under the terms of the 1990 Clean Air Act amendments, Southern California’s Regional Clean Air Incentives Market (RECLAIM) was the first to come into effect, in 1993. With more than 350 facilities in its nitrogen oxide (NOx) market and roughly 40 in its SO2 market, RECLAIM can make some claim to that ‘oldest’ title.

But being the oldest is not easy and RECLAIM has seen more than its share of controversy in the past five years. The California energy crisis of 2000 certainly did not help this market, which covers sources around the Los Angeles basin. Trading on a per pound basis rather than per ton, prices for NOx rocketed up to more than $60 per pound in 2000 ($45,000/ton) from $1–2 per pound in 1999.

Regulators were forced to act. Both the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and then Governor Gray Davis announced measures to relieve NOx price pressures on power generators in the state. By May 2001, the SCAQMD had removed power plants from the programme entirely.

While the generators were not the only participants in the NOx market, they were the most consistent buyers of allowances. With their removal, the predictable happened: prices collapsed, falling below $1 per pound in 2001 with trades as low as 15¢ per pound in subsequent years.

The SCAQMD is considering plans to bring the power generators back into the programme but, as the plants were required to install pollution control technology as part of the agreement to remove them from RECLAIM obligations, a cut in their allocation is being debated. Even with a cut, the power generators will probably now enter the market as sellers rather than buyers. At any rate, their re-entry into the market may not come before 2007 and prices remain depressed, currently in the 30–50¢ range.

Of course, RECLAIM is not the only regional market, just the oldest. In January 2002, the Houston–Galveston Area NOx programme was born, covering 320 sources in the region, an attempt to bring that region into compliance with federal ozone standards. By the end 2007, the programme aims to cut NOx emissions by 90% from a baseline that is calculated from sources’ average emissions over 1997–99.

Unfortunately, the market has been designed so that the big cuts do not come until later and thus far only electricity generators have seen any cuts at all. The trading preference in this market is for streams of allowances starting in the current year and extending in perpetuity. Spot year tons for the current year have traded only a little in this market, establishing prices at $60/ton for 2002s, roughly $140 for 2003s and around $400 for this year.

But streams of allowances are where the action really happens, with prices starting off 2002 just above $30,000 in perpetuity, ranging up to $46,000 by the time Enron’s assets were auctioned off, in June 2002, and falling back to around $37,000 this year. With market split between industry giants such as Reliant and very small players that emit only few tons of NOx per year, trades can vary greatly in price and size.